A bride-to-be says her future mother-in-law is insisting on keeping a large share of the couple’s monetary wedding gifts — all because she helped pay for the big day.
In a post on Reddit’s wedding drama forum, the bride explained that she and her fiancé are planning an approximately $80,000 wedding in Singapore, with about $30,000 of that coming from the groom’s mother. Because she’s contributing financially, the groom’s mother now claims she is entitled to the cash gifts given at the celebration.
The bride, who is from Singapore, noted that it’s customary in her culture for guests to give money rather than physical presents. The cash is both practical support for the couple and a symbol of prosperity and well-wishes. She also acknowledged that $80,000 sounds extravagant, but said that, given the scale and details of weddings in her community, it’s considered fairly mid-range.
Of the roughly 500 guests expected, the groom’s mother invited about 300 of them — mostly her own relatives, friends, and church members. She argues that she should be allowed to keep the monetary gifts from those guests.
“Her reason is that she has previously given them gifts when she attended their occasions, so she feels those returns belong to her,” the bride wrote.
The bride’s concern is that the total cash from those 300 guests is likely to exceed the $30,000 her future mother-in-law contributed, meaning the older woman could profit from the wedding instead of simply helping to fund it.
:max_bytes(150000):strip_icc():focal(749x0:751x2):format(webp)/angbao-red-envelopes-120825-37070e9ec04246e3b5a67fe52fd3114e.jpg)
According to the bride, this arrangement would leave her and her fiancé carrying more of the actual cost of the event, “while she recovers more than what she contributed, and still expects repayment on top of that.”
“It does not feel balanced or fair, especially when my side does not even reach 100 guests, and my parents are not contributing financially at all,” she added.
Commenters on Reddit were quick to call out the situation. One person noted that the mother-in-law’s logic didn’t hold up: “She chose to give gifts to others. It has nothing to do with you or your wedding,” they wrote. Another pointed out that, in many families, a parent’s contribution to the wedding is viewed as their gift to the couple — not a loan or an investment to be recouped.
:max_bytes(150000):strip_icc():focal(793x317:795x319):format(webp)/wedding-mother-in-law-042825-da189f7c133047e5891c0c8c8af671c8.jpg)
Ultimately, in an update, the bride shared that she and her fiancé decided to postpone the wedding until June 2027 and significantly reduce the guest list. They are also turning down the $30,000 offer from the groom’s mother so that she has no control over the event or its finances. After the couple informed her of their decision, the bride said, the groom’s mother came to understand that her expectations around the cash gifts had been unfair.